Nearby Petitions

Your Location
null

Filter by category

Country

Australia Bangladesh Belgium Canada Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Switzerland Germany Denmark Egypt Finland France United Kingdom Ireland India Italy Jersey Japan Netherlands Norway New Zealand Philippines Sweden United States South Africa

All Petitions

  • Fossil Free Chapman
    As global citizens we question the moral implications of profiting from the fossil fuel industry. The impacts of climate change are disproportionately affecting minority populations of race and class, as well as those who have contributed least to global warming.
    322 of 400 Signatures
    Created by Clayton Heard
  • Trinity College, University of Dublin, Fossil Fuel Divestment
    80% of current fuel reserves must stay unburned to have a significant probability of staying below the 2 degree limit of warming. However the markets place a multi trillion dollar value on this unburnable carbon reserve. Therefore, assuming effective legislation, to curb emissions and prevent catastrophic global warming, is introduced, this trillion dollar carbon bubble will burst. This means anyone who has investments in fossil fuel companies will suffer huge devaluation. Furthermore, actively investing money in the fossil fuel industry is effectively betting that we will not act to save the planet. This is an incredibly cynical position to take, one which hampers efforts to protect the climate and puts investors at risk of huge losses. As such, we believe divestment will not only be a sound decision for our institution’s financial portfolio, but also for the well being of its current and future graduating classes, who deserve the opportunity to graduate with a future not defined by climate chaos.
    1,936 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Colm Tong
  • Fossil Free ULg - Pour que l'Université de Liège retire ses investissements des énergies fossiles
    Un mouvement mondial pour résoudre la crise climatique est en marche et vous pouvez y contribuer en agissant à un niveau local ! Aujourd’hui, les campagnes de désinvestissement des énergies fossiles se multiplient et nous demandons à l’ULg de se joindre au mouvement sans plus tarder. Pourquoi désinvestir des énergies fossiles ? Lors de la COP21, les États du monde entier se sont mis d’accord sur le fait que l’augmentation de la température terrestre moyenne ne doit pas dépasser 2°C (par rapport à l’ère pré-industrielle). L’accord de Paris mentionne même un objectif de 1,5°C. L’utilisation d’énergies fossiles est l’une des plus importantes causes d’émissions de CO2 dans l’atmosphère. Ce gaz est l’un des principaux responsables de l’augmentation de la température terrestre. Pour atteindre cet objectif de 2°C, 80 % des réserves connues d’énergies fossiles ne doivent pas être utilisées et doivent donc rester dans le sol. Pourquoi cibler l’ULg ? L’ULg dispose de fonds qu’elle place en bourse. Actuellement, l'université n’a pas conditionné ces placements à des critères éthiques. Une partie de cet argent est investi dans plusieurs des 200 entreprises qui disposent des plus grandes réserves d’énergies fossiles au monde et contribue ainsi à financer une industrie qui devrait d’urgence cesser ses activités. Or, l’ULg pourrait privilégier un investissement socialement responsable et investir dans des énergies renouvelables. Pourquoi votre signature est-elle importante ? En avril 2016, le Conseil d’Administration de l’ULg (CA) a été interpellé sur ses investissements et la possibilité que ceux-ci ne soient plus destinés à des entreprises ayant une activité nocive pour notre planète. A ce jour, ces demandes n’ont pas suscité d’intérêt auprès du CA. Pourtant, d'autres institutions et d'autres universités, telles celles d'Oxford, Yale et Stanford ont déjà franchi le pas et retiré leurs investissements de l'industrie extractive. Par cette pétition, nous voulons envoyer un signal fort aux autorités universitaires et leur faire savoir que nous, citoyen·ne·s libre·s et responsable·s - étudiant·e·s, diplômé·e·s, enseignant·e·s, chercheur·euse·s, assistant·e·s, membres du personnel administratif, technique et ouvrier, Liégeois·e·s ou habitant·e·s de cette Terre - n’acceptons pas que l’ULg compromette notre avenir et celui de notre planète en soutenant l’industrie des combustibles fossiles. Nous demandons à l'Université de Liège de faire preuve de responsabilité. En signant cette pétition, je marque mon soutien à la campagne « Fossil Free ULg » et demande à ce que l’ULg : - gèle immédiatement tout nouvel investissement dans les combustibles fossiles ; - établisse un calendrier de retrait de ses investissements dans les énergies fossiles pour arriver dès que possible à un pourcentage nul d’investissement dans les énergies fossiles et ce, dans un délai de 5 ans maximum. Cher·e signataire, le cas échéant, merci de préciser votre relation avec l'ULg dans votre signature (étudiant·e, membre du corps professoral, employé·e, ancien·ne étudiant·e, sous-traitant·e, etc.). Campagne soutenue par : 350.org Belgium, Barricade asbl, La Casa Nicaragua, Le CETRI, Comac ULg, écolo j ULg, ESL, Financité, Greenpeace Liège, GUS, INTAL et Universud et d'autres à venir...
    1,558 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Fossil Free ULg Picture
  • Essen Raus Aus RWE - Bürgerbrief
    Als Teil einer weltweiten Bewegung setzen wir uns dafür ein, dass Essen jetzt beginnt, klimaschädliche Investitionen zu beenden und klimaneutral zu werden. Mehr Information zur Fossil-Free-Bewegung: http://gofossilfree.org/de/
    909 of 1,000 Signatures
    Created by Andreas Brinck
  • University of Canterbury: divest from fossil fuels
    "It’s simple math: we can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide and stay below 2°C of warming — anything more than that risks catastrophe for life on earth. The only problem? Burning the fossil fuel that corporations now have in their reserves would result in emitting 2,795 gigatons of carbon dioxide – five times the safe amount." – 350.org As a reputable university we have an opportunity to be leaders in a global movement that can actually bring a positive change for society. Young people are going to have to endure the effects of global climate change, and our education institutions should act to become part of the solution. Visit our facebook page to like or discuss: https://www.facebook.com/ucdivests/
    2,277 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Nick Hanafin Picture
  • Divest the London Pension Fund from Fossil Fuels
    Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, supports divestment! http://www.sadiq.london/a_greener_cleaner_london Climate change is the greatest challenge humanity has encountered. Warming in excess of 1.5°C will have catastrophic consequences [1]. In order to have a chance of staying below this temperature rise, 80% of known fossil fuel reserves must not be burnt [2]. The fossil fuel industry currently holds vast carbon reserves which if burnt would result in emissions 5 times larger than what it is deemed to be safe [2]. All available evidence suggests that fossil fuel companies intend to burn the reserves within their control. In addition, companies such as Shell are actively trying to discover new reserves, often in environmentally sensitive regions [3]. If it is wrong to damage the world we live in, then it is wrong to profit from that damage. Responsible investors should no longer be profiting from the destructive activities of these companies. The London Pension Fund Authority (LPFA) manages the pensions of City Hall employees (including the Mayor of London and the London Assembly) as well as many other local authorities [4]. It manages nearly £5 billion worth of assets, millions of which are direct investments in fossil fuel companies including BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Shell [5]. Indirect investments total £54.6 million. These fossil fuel investments are becoming increasingly risky as the cost of extraction increases and international treaties restrict the use of fossil fuels [2]. Not only does it make moral sense not to invest in the destruction of our planet, it also makes financial sense. By divesting from fossil fuels, City Hall will join public institutions such as the British Medical Association, Glasgow University and Oxford City Council, amongst many others, in leading by example to help create a sustainable future for the citizens of London and beyond. So we ask: 1. The London Pensions Fund Authority (LPFA) to: - Immediately freeze any new investment in fossil fuel companies, including those made by externally managed and pooled funds. - Offer a fossil free pension option to employees - Divest from the top 200 companies with the largest known carbon reserves (oil, gas and coal), and shift these funds to lower risk, ethical investments within 5 years 2. The Mayor and the London Assembly must be transparent about their relationship with the fossil fuel industry: - Publish full details of their financial and other ties to the fossil fuel industry - Not accept sponsorship and advertising from fossil fuel companies. - Declare their divestment from the fossil fuel industry in order to encourage other pension funds, institutions and individuals to do the same. References [1]http://bit.ly/1Cp61vN [2]http://bit.ly/1mLPo58 [3]http://bit.ly/1r2Y2Qb [4]http://www.lpfa.org.uk/Who-we-are.aspx [5]http://bit.ly/1z8u53U
    2,270 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Divest London
  • Divest Somerset County Council Pension Fund from fossil fuels
    Somerset - on the front line of climate change. Climate Change has caused, and is predicted to cause, a much greater risk of flooding and extreme weather. After the devastating floods of the Somerset Levels in 2013 Somerset County Council saw the terrible impact of climate change first hand. The Council recognises the potential impacts of climate change yet its pension fund invests £121,505,000 in the very fossil fuel companies that are causing climate change ! Yes, 8.3% of the fund, the 10th highest % in the UK, invested in the problem ! We can't afford to burn 80% of the world’s coal, oil and gas reserves if we want to keep climate change below the 2oC 'tipping point'. As governments begin to regulate more closely after the Paris COP agreement, cheaper renewables and oversupply of crude oil globally will see the value of fossil fuels plummet, reserves will become 'stranded assets' and the share price will drop. This makes investing in fossil fuels increasingly risky for all stakeholders. Financial experts, including the Bank of England, Goldman Sachs, Standard and Poor's and AXA, have warned of the economic risk that climate change policies pose to fossil fuel companies. Somerset County Council needs to be ahead of the curve to safeguard the future pensions of all its shareholders. Somerset County Council recognises that it must do whatever it can to tackle climate change and it has a responsibility to divest from an industry that jeopardises the future of our planet. Yet the short term financial gain that the Pension Fund Committee hopes to achieve comes at the risk of financial loss and a cost to people and planet. We hope Somerset County County Council pension trustees are aware of September’s UNEP Finance Initiative Report, Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century – which concludes that: "Failing to consider long-term investment value drivers, which include environmental, social and governance issues, in investment practice is a failure of fiduciary duty.” Instead of fossil fuel investment, SCC Pension Fund Committee should invest in solutions to climate change, investments that protect pensions and planet, joining The British Medical Association, Bristol City Council and Oxford City Council who have all recently agreed to make the commitment to no direct investment in the fossil fuel industry. Globally Somerset County Council would join over 400 institutions and 2000 individuals with an asset base of $2.6 trillion who are already divesting across the world. Time is running out to stop runaway climate change, (2) it make no moral or economic sense to invest in fossil fuels. The time to change was 30 years ago but massive divestment now is a key part in getting to zero emissions by 2030 and having a chance. Please sign the petition and encourage others to do so. (1) http://math.350.org/ 350.org has revealed how much every UK council invests in fossil fuels. Petition from Cllr Shane Collins, Leader of the Green Group on Mendip Council, East Mendip Green Party, South Somerset Green Party. (2) Kevin Anderson https://www.science.su.se/english/about-us/calendar/the-gordon-goodman-memorial-lecture-2017-kevin-anderson-1.341476
    1,135 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Cllr Shane Collins Picture
  • Köln: Raus aus RWE!
    zu 1) RWE-Aktien Umwelt und Gesundheit: Die RWE AG hält weiterhin an klimaschädlichen Kohlekraftwerken fest und plant sogar den Bau eines neuen Kohlekraftwerke vor den Toren Kölns! [1] Das rheinische Braunkohlerevier ist der größte CO2-Emittent in Europa [2]. Insgesamt stößt RWE 150,8 Mio. Tonnen CO2 pro Jahr aus. [3] Die Emissionen der Kohleverstromung durch RWE verursachen Gesundheits- und Klimafolgekosten in Höhe von 13,3 Milliarden €/Jahr laut Zahlen des Umweltbundesamtes. [4] Die Kohlekraftwerke von RWE stoßen große Mengen an Schadstoffen wie Feinstaub, Schwermetalle und Quecksilber aus. Laut einer Greenpeace-Studie ist RWE damit statistisch verantwortlich für 10.266 verlorene Lebensjahre bzw. 959 vorzeitige Todesfälle pro Jahr. [5] Auch heute noch werden Menschen zwangsumgesiedelt und Dörfer, Wälder sowie Landschaften werden zerstört, weil sie den Braunkohletagebauen von RWE weichen müssen. Finanzen: An den RWE-Aktien festzuhalten ist ökonomisch nicht sinnvoll. Der Wert der Aktie ist seit 2008 um 90% (!) gefallen. Dies bedeutet für die Kommunen in NRW einen Verlust in Milliardenhöhe. [6] Die RWE AG schüttet in diesem Jahr erstmalig keine Dividende aus, wodurch Löcher in die Haushalte der Kommunen gerissen werden, in denen die Dividende fest eingeplant war. [7] Die RWE AG ist mit 25 Milliarden Euro hoch verschuldet. Dadurch besteht ein erhebliches Insolvenzrisiko. Im Falle einer Insovenz würde die Stadt Köln weitere 16,5 Millionen Euro verlieren (ca. 1,5 Mio. RWE-Aktien, aktueller Kurs der RWE-Aktie ca. 11€ - Stand: 8.3.2016). [8] In den letzten 15 Jahren hat sich die Bewertung der RWE-Aktie durch die Rating-Agenturen Standard & Poor's und Moddy's nicht verbessert, sondern nur verschlechtert. Aktuell werden die RWE-Aktie bei Moody's auf Ba1 eingestuft: „Spekulative Anlage. Bei Verschlechterung der Lage ist mit Ausfällen zu rechnen.“ [9] Um die Energiewende zu verwirklichen und dem Klimawandel Einhalt zu gebieten, fordert der Weltklimarat (IPCC) Investitionen aus der fossilen Industrie abzuziehen und in Erneuerbare Energien zu investieren. [10] Zu 2) Pensionsfond An den Wertpapieren der fossilen Industrie im Pensionsfond der Stadt Köln festzuhalten ist ökonomisch nicht sinnvoll. Die fossile Industrie wird mittelfristig in finanzielle Schwierigkeiten geraten, weil 80% der fossilen Energiereserven (Kohle, Öl, Gas) im Boden bleiben müssen, um das 2-Grad-Ziel von Paris zu erreichen. [11] Damit wird ihre Existenzgrundlage in absehbarer Zeit wegfallen. Die Kohle-, Öl- und Gas-Unternehmen haben jedoch 100% der fossilen Energiereserven als Vermögenswerte in ihren Bilanzen verbucht und diese somit künstlich aufgebläht. Diese sogenannte 'Kohlenstoffblase' (Carbon Bubble) droht zu platzen und kann, wie verschiedene Finanzanalysen zeigen, zu einem Kollaps des Finanzsystems führen. [12] Es macht daher keinen Sinn, in dem langfristig angelegten Pensionsfond der Stadt Köln derart risikoreiche Wertpapiere zu halten. Diese Petition wird unterstützt von: Greenpeace Köln, Fossil Free Köln Quellen: [1] Brief von Herrn Hartung (RWE) an Greenpeace, 09.03.2016 [2] Emissionsregister des Umweltbundesamtes http://www.thru.de [3] RWE Geschäftsbericht 2015, S. 46, http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/de/2974770/data/2974864/8/rwe/investor-relations/RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2015.pdf [4] Strommengen aus RWE Geschäftsbericht 2015, Seite 45: http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/de/2974770/data/2974864/8/rwe/investor-relations/RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2015.pdf Kosten aus Greenpeace Studie "Was Strom wirklich kostet" Seite 23 und 25. --> Eigene Berechnung: Braunkohlestrom: 77,8 TWh x 11,5 ct/kWh = 8,95 Milliarden €. Steinkohlestrom: 46,5 TWh x 9,5 ct/kWh = 4,42 Millarden €. externe Kosten durch die Kohleverstromung: 8,95 Mrd. € + 4,42 Mrd. € = 13,4 Milliarden € https://www.greenpeace-energy.de/fileadmin/docs/publikationen/Studien/Greenpeace_Energy_Was_Strom_wirklich_kostet_Langfassung2015.pdf [5] Studie Greenpeace „Tod aus dem Schlot“, Seite 13 https://www.greenpeace.de/sites/www.greenpeace.de/files/publications/greenpeace-studie-tod-aus-dem-schlot-s01652.pdf [6] RWE-Aktienkurs http://www.finanzen.net/aktien/rwe-Aktie [7] Artikel zur RWE-Dividende in „Die Welt“ http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/energie/article152345205/Warum-der-RWE-Schock-Millionen-Menschen-trifft.html [8] RWE-Aktienkurs http://www.finanzen.net/aktien/rwe-Aktie [9] Artikel in der Süddeutschen Zeit vom 13.04.2014 http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/kampf-gegen-den-klimawandel-klimarat-fordert-neues-wirtschaftssystem-1.1936571 [10] Rating der RWE-Aktie von August und Oktober 2015, http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/de/1775774/rwe/investor-relations/anleihen/kreditrating/ [11] Studie des Weltklimarates (IPCC) http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ [12] Artikel zum Finanzrisiko Kohlenstoffblase in der „Zeit“ und "Die Welt": http://www.zeit.de/2014/08/carbon-bubble-rohstoff-blase http://www.welt.de/finanzen/geldanlage/article142272549/Wie-die-Energiewende-globale-Geldfluesse-umleitet.html
    668 of 800 Signatures
    Created by Markus Schmidt Picture
  • Divest Oak Ridge From Fossil Fuels
    Since climate change is already affecting people around the world, we need to step up as a community and take action. By divesting from fossil fuels, we can invest in other technologies that will help fuel the future without destroying the planet. In Oak Ridge, we have the power and resources to develop and implement these technologies, so we must lead the way by taking a stand against the fossil fuel industry.
    275 of 300 Signatures
    Created by Secret City Sustainability
  • Fossil Free NHMU
    Over 54,000 people have signed on the national campaign asking 5 museums, of which the Utah Natural History Museum (UNMH) is one, to divest from fossil fuels. http://gofossilfree.org/museums/ This moment calls for leaders that are ready to do more than observe and curate history — it calls for leaders who are ready to help make it. We believe museums can be those leaders. The California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, The Field Museum in Chicago, The Phipps Conservatory in Pittsburg, The London Museum of Science, and The Australian Academy of Sciences have already taking this important step of divestment. In addition to fossil fuel divestment growing internationally, www.BreakFree2016.org is a global project that is coordinating a global wave of escalated direct actions to stop some of the largest fossil fuel projects in the world. 2016 could be a turning point in the climate justice movement. Faculty and students at the University of Utah are ready for this moment and have been campaigning since 2012 to have the University of Utah to divest from fossil fuels: https://campaigns.gofossilfree.org/petitions/Fossil_Free_UUtah. In May 2015 the Academic Senate made the recommendation to create a policy that would support fossil fuel divestment and in March 2016 this recommendation was further supported with a timeline for September 2016: http://www.boarddocs.com/ut/uutah/asop/Board.nsf/files/A8JUX87A9B14/$file/Ad%20Hoc%20Re-Investment%20Dialogue%20Committee%20Report%20-%20March%202016.pdf This timeline will coincide with activists from around the world escalating pressure on global leaders to maintain a 2 degree limit in warming, keep 80% of the Fossil Fuels in the ground and create a just transition to renewables by 2050. We are prepared to celebrate divestment at the U of U or escalate our tactics along with www.breakfree2016.org. If you haven't read this Open Letter to Museums yet, please take a look and consider how urgent it is to create economic decisions that reflect our public sustainability missions: http://thenaturalhistorymuseum.org/open-letter-to-museums-from-scientists/
    483 of 500 Signatures
    Created by Ryan Pleune