Nearby Petitions

Your Location
null

Filter by category

Country

Australia Bangladesh Belgium Canada Congo, The Democratic Republic of the Switzerland Germany Denmark Egypt Finland France United Kingdom Ireland India Italy Jersey Japan Netherlands Norway New Zealand Philippines Sweden United States South Africa

All Petitions

  • Essen Raus Aus RWE - Bürgerbrief
    Als Teil einer weltweiten Bewegung setzen wir uns dafür ein, dass Essen jetzt beginnt, klimaschädliche Investitionen zu beenden und klimaneutral zu werden. Mehr Information zur Fossil-Free-Bewegung: http://gofossilfree.org/de/
    909 of 1,000 Signatures
    Created by Andreas Brinck
  • University of Canterbury: divest from fossil fuels
    "It’s simple math: we can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide and stay below 2°C of warming — anything more than that risks catastrophe for life on earth. The only problem? Burning the fossil fuel that corporations now have in their reserves would result in emitting 2,795 gigatons of carbon dioxide – five times the safe amount." – 350.org As a reputable university we have an opportunity to be leaders in a global movement that can actually bring a positive change for society. Young people are going to have to endure the effects of global climate change, and our education institutions should act to become part of the solution. Visit our facebook page to like or discuss: https://www.facebook.com/ucdivests/
    2,278 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Nick Hanafin Picture
  • Divest the London Pension Fund from Fossil Fuels
    Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, supports divestment! http://www.sadiq.london/a_greener_cleaner_london Climate change is the greatest challenge humanity has encountered. Warming in excess of 1.5°C will have catastrophic consequences [1]. In order to have a chance of staying below this temperature rise, 80% of known fossil fuel reserves must not be burnt [2]. The fossil fuel industry currently holds vast carbon reserves which if burnt would result in emissions 5 times larger than what it is deemed to be safe [2]. All available evidence suggests that fossil fuel companies intend to burn the reserves within their control. In addition, companies such as Shell are actively trying to discover new reserves, often in environmentally sensitive regions [3]. If it is wrong to damage the world we live in, then it is wrong to profit from that damage. Responsible investors should no longer be profiting from the destructive activities of these companies. The London Pension Fund Authority (LPFA) manages the pensions of City Hall employees (including the Mayor of London and the London Assembly) as well as many other local authorities [4]. It manages nearly £5 billion worth of assets, millions of which are direct investments in fossil fuel companies including BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Shell [5]. Indirect investments total £54.6 million. These fossil fuel investments are becoming increasingly risky as the cost of extraction increases and international treaties restrict the use of fossil fuels [2]. Not only does it make moral sense not to invest in the destruction of our planet, it also makes financial sense. By divesting from fossil fuels, City Hall will join public institutions such as the British Medical Association, Glasgow University and Oxford City Council, amongst many others, in leading by example to help create a sustainable future for the citizens of London and beyond. So we ask: 1. The London Pensions Fund Authority (LPFA) to: - Immediately freeze any new investment in fossil fuel companies, including those made by externally managed and pooled funds. - Offer a fossil free pension option to employees - Divest from the top 200 companies with the largest known carbon reserves (oil, gas and coal), and shift these funds to lower risk, ethical investments within 5 years 2. The Mayor and the London Assembly must be transparent about their relationship with the fossil fuel industry: - Publish full details of their financial and other ties to the fossil fuel industry - Not accept sponsorship and advertising from fossil fuel companies. - Declare their divestment from the fossil fuel industry in order to encourage other pension funds, institutions and individuals to do the same. References [1]http://bit.ly/1Cp61vN [2]http://bit.ly/1mLPo58 [3]http://bit.ly/1r2Y2Qb [4]http://www.lpfa.org.uk/Who-we-are.aspx [5]http://bit.ly/1z8u53U
    2,274 of 3,000 Signatures
    Created by Divest London
  • Divest Somerset County Council Pension Fund from fossil fuels
    Somerset - on the front line of climate change. Climate Change has caused, and is predicted to cause, a much greater risk of flooding and extreme weather. After the devastating floods of the Somerset Levels in 2013 Somerset County Council saw the terrible impact of climate change first hand. The Council recognises the potential impacts of climate change yet its pension fund invests £121,505,000 in the very fossil fuel companies that are causing climate change ! Yes, 8.3% of the fund, the 10th highest % in the UK, invested in the problem ! We can't afford to burn 80% of the world’s coal, oil and gas reserves if we want to keep climate change below the 2oC 'tipping point'. As governments begin to regulate more closely after the Paris COP agreement, cheaper renewables and oversupply of crude oil globally will see the value of fossil fuels plummet, reserves will become 'stranded assets' and the share price will drop. This makes investing in fossil fuels increasingly risky for all stakeholders. Financial experts, including the Bank of England, Goldman Sachs, Standard and Poor's and AXA, have warned of the economic risk that climate change policies pose to fossil fuel companies. Somerset County Council needs to be ahead of the curve to safeguard the future pensions of all its shareholders. Somerset County Council recognises that it must do whatever it can to tackle climate change and it has a responsibility to divest from an industry that jeopardises the future of our planet. Yet the short term financial gain that the Pension Fund Committee hopes to achieve comes at the risk of financial loss and a cost to people and planet. We hope Somerset County County Council pension trustees are aware of September’s UNEP Finance Initiative Report, Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century – which concludes that: "Failing to consider long-term investment value drivers, which include environmental, social and governance issues, in investment practice is a failure of fiduciary duty.” Instead of fossil fuel investment, SCC Pension Fund Committee should invest in solutions to climate change, investments that protect pensions and planet, joining The British Medical Association, Bristol City Council and Oxford City Council who have all recently agreed to make the commitment to no direct investment in the fossil fuel industry. Globally Somerset County Council would join over 400 institutions and 2000 individuals with an asset base of $2.6 trillion who are already divesting across the world. Time is running out to stop runaway climate change, (2) it make no moral or economic sense to invest in fossil fuels. The time to change was 30 years ago but massive divestment now is a key part in getting to zero emissions by 2030 and having a chance. Please sign the petition and encourage others to do so. (1) http://math.350.org/ 350.org has revealed how much every UK council invests in fossil fuels. Petition from Cllr Shane Collins, Leader of the Green Group on Mendip Council, East Mendip Green Party, South Somerset Green Party. (2) Kevin Anderson https://www.science.su.se/english/about-us/calendar/the-gordon-goodman-memorial-lecture-2017-kevin-anderson-1.341476
    1,140 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Cllr Shane Collins Picture
  • Köln: Raus aus RWE!
    zu 1) RWE-Aktien Umwelt und Gesundheit: Die RWE AG hält weiterhin an klimaschädlichen Kohlekraftwerken fest und plant sogar den Bau eines neuen Kohlekraftwerke vor den Toren Kölns! [1] Das rheinische Braunkohlerevier ist der größte CO2-Emittent in Europa [2]. Insgesamt stößt RWE 150,8 Mio. Tonnen CO2 pro Jahr aus. [3] Die Emissionen der Kohleverstromung durch RWE verursachen Gesundheits- und Klimafolgekosten in Höhe von 13,3 Milliarden €/Jahr laut Zahlen des Umweltbundesamtes. [4] Die Kohlekraftwerke von RWE stoßen große Mengen an Schadstoffen wie Feinstaub, Schwermetalle und Quecksilber aus. Laut einer Greenpeace-Studie ist RWE damit statistisch verantwortlich für 10.266 verlorene Lebensjahre bzw. 959 vorzeitige Todesfälle pro Jahr. [5] Auch heute noch werden Menschen zwangsumgesiedelt und Dörfer, Wälder sowie Landschaften werden zerstört, weil sie den Braunkohletagebauen von RWE weichen müssen. Finanzen: An den RWE-Aktien festzuhalten ist ökonomisch nicht sinnvoll. Der Wert der Aktie ist seit 2008 um 90% (!) gefallen. Dies bedeutet für die Kommunen in NRW einen Verlust in Milliardenhöhe. [6] Die RWE AG schüttet in diesem Jahr erstmalig keine Dividende aus, wodurch Löcher in die Haushalte der Kommunen gerissen werden, in denen die Dividende fest eingeplant war. [7] Die RWE AG ist mit 25 Milliarden Euro hoch verschuldet. Dadurch besteht ein erhebliches Insolvenzrisiko. Im Falle einer Insovenz würde die Stadt Köln weitere 16,5 Millionen Euro verlieren (ca. 1,5 Mio. RWE-Aktien, aktueller Kurs der RWE-Aktie ca. 11€ - Stand: 8.3.2016). [8] In den letzten 15 Jahren hat sich die Bewertung der RWE-Aktie durch die Rating-Agenturen Standard & Poor's und Moddy's nicht verbessert, sondern nur verschlechtert. Aktuell werden die RWE-Aktie bei Moody's auf Ba1 eingestuft: „Spekulative Anlage. Bei Verschlechterung der Lage ist mit Ausfällen zu rechnen.“ [9] Um die Energiewende zu verwirklichen und dem Klimawandel Einhalt zu gebieten, fordert der Weltklimarat (IPCC) Investitionen aus der fossilen Industrie abzuziehen und in Erneuerbare Energien zu investieren. [10] Zu 2) Pensionsfond An den Wertpapieren der fossilen Industrie im Pensionsfond der Stadt Köln festzuhalten ist ökonomisch nicht sinnvoll. Die fossile Industrie wird mittelfristig in finanzielle Schwierigkeiten geraten, weil 80% der fossilen Energiereserven (Kohle, Öl, Gas) im Boden bleiben müssen, um das 2-Grad-Ziel von Paris zu erreichen. [11] Damit wird ihre Existenzgrundlage in absehbarer Zeit wegfallen. Die Kohle-, Öl- und Gas-Unternehmen haben jedoch 100% der fossilen Energiereserven als Vermögenswerte in ihren Bilanzen verbucht und diese somit künstlich aufgebläht. Diese sogenannte 'Kohlenstoffblase' (Carbon Bubble) droht zu platzen und kann, wie verschiedene Finanzanalysen zeigen, zu einem Kollaps des Finanzsystems führen. [12] Es macht daher keinen Sinn, in dem langfristig angelegten Pensionsfond der Stadt Köln derart risikoreiche Wertpapiere zu halten. Diese Petition wird unterstützt von: Greenpeace Köln, Fossil Free Köln Quellen: [1] Brief von Herrn Hartung (RWE) an Greenpeace, 09.03.2016 [2] Emissionsregister des Umweltbundesamtes http://www.thru.de [3] RWE Geschäftsbericht 2015, S. 46, http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/de/2974770/data/2974864/8/rwe/investor-relations/RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2015.pdf [4] Strommengen aus RWE Geschäftsbericht 2015, Seite 45: http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/mediablob/de/2974770/data/2974864/8/rwe/investor-relations/RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2015.pdf Kosten aus Greenpeace Studie "Was Strom wirklich kostet" Seite 23 und 25. --> Eigene Berechnung: Braunkohlestrom: 77,8 TWh x 11,5 ct/kWh = 8,95 Milliarden €. Steinkohlestrom: 46,5 TWh x 9,5 ct/kWh = 4,42 Millarden €. externe Kosten durch die Kohleverstromung: 8,95 Mrd. € + 4,42 Mrd. € = 13,4 Milliarden € https://www.greenpeace-energy.de/fileadmin/docs/publikationen/Studien/Greenpeace_Energy_Was_Strom_wirklich_kostet_Langfassung2015.pdf [5] Studie Greenpeace „Tod aus dem Schlot“, Seite 13 https://www.greenpeace.de/sites/www.greenpeace.de/files/publications/greenpeace-studie-tod-aus-dem-schlot-s01652.pdf [6] RWE-Aktienkurs http://www.finanzen.net/aktien/rwe-Aktie [7] Artikel zur RWE-Dividende in „Die Welt“ http://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/energie/article152345205/Warum-der-RWE-Schock-Millionen-Menschen-trifft.html [8] RWE-Aktienkurs http://www.finanzen.net/aktien/rwe-Aktie [9] Artikel in der Süddeutschen Zeit vom 13.04.2014 http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/kampf-gegen-den-klimawandel-klimarat-fordert-neues-wirtschaftssystem-1.1936571 [10] Rating der RWE-Aktie von August und Oktober 2015, http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/de/1775774/rwe/investor-relations/anleihen/kreditrating/ [11] Studie des Weltklimarates (IPCC) http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/ [12] Artikel zum Finanzrisiko Kohlenstoffblase in der „Zeit“ und "Die Welt": http://www.zeit.de/2014/08/carbon-bubble-rohstoff-blase http://www.welt.de/finanzen/geldanlage/article142272549/Wie-die-Energiewende-globale-Geldfluesse-umleitet.html
    669 of 800 Signatures
    Created by Markus Schmidt Picture
  • Divest Oak Ridge From Fossil Fuels
    Since climate change is already affecting people around the world, we need to step up as a community and take action. By divesting from fossil fuels, we can invest in other technologies that will help fuel the future without destroying the planet. In Oak Ridge, we have the power and resources to develop and implement these technologies, so we must lead the way by taking a stand against the fossil fuel industry.
    290 of 300 Signatures
    Created by Secret City Sustainability
  • Fossil Free NHMU
    Over 54,000 people have signed on the national campaign asking 5 museums, of which the Utah Natural History Museum (UNMH) is one, to divest from fossil fuels. http://gofossilfree.org/museums/ This moment calls for leaders that are ready to do more than observe and curate history — it calls for leaders who are ready to help make it. We believe museums can be those leaders. The California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, The Field Museum in Chicago, The Phipps Conservatory in Pittsburg, The London Museum of Science, and The Australian Academy of Sciences have already taking this important step of divestment. In addition to fossil fuel divestment growing internationally, www.BreakFree2016.org is a global project that is coordinating a global wave of escalated direct actions to stop some of the largest fossil fuel projects in the world. 2016 could be a turning point in the climate justice movement. Faculty and students at the University of Utah are ready for this moment and have been campaigning since 2012 to have the University of Utah to divest from fossil fuels: https://campaigns.gofossilfree.org/petitions/Fossil_Free_UUtah. In May 2015 the Academic Senate made the recommendation to create a policy that would support fossil fuel divestment and in March 2016 this recommendation was further supported with a timeline for September 2016: http://www.boarddocs.com/ut/uutah/asop/Board.nsf/files/A8JUX87A9B14/$file/Ad%20Hoc%20Re-Investment%20Dialogue%20Committee%20Report%20-%20March%202016.pdf This timeline will coincide with activists from around the world escalating pressure on global leaders to maintain a 2 degree limit in warming, keep 80% of the Fossil Fuels in the ground and create a just transition to renewables by 2050. We are prepared to celebrate divestment at the U of U or escalate our tactics along with www.breakfree2016.org. If you haven't read this Open Letter to Museums yet, please take a look and consider how urgent it is to create economic decisions that reflect our public sustainability missions: http://thenaturalhistorymuseum.org/open-letter-to-museums-from-scientists/
    485 of 500 Signatures
    Created by Ryan Pleune
  • Divest QMUL from fossil fuels
    Climate change is happening and it is harmful; very few people deny this nowadays. So why is it okay for QMUL and other universities and organisations, which are supposed to be setting an example to the younger generation, to profit from this damage? Too many UK universities support the fossil fuel industry directly through their research, their endowments and investments and their partnerships with some of the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world like BP and Shell. For this reason, UK students have decided to take on the fossil fuel industry by getting our universities to go Fossil Free. People & Planet is joining forces with the 350.org campaign that has been sweeping across North American campuses. By divesting, QMUL will join many universities, religious institutions and local governments across the world that have already committed. Only with a combined effort can we make a substantial dent in the financial support that fossil fuel companies require to survive. The response of QMUL to a Freedom of Information Act request last year proved that the university does have investments in fossil fuels. However, the university refused to specify how much money and in which companies. However, the response did inform us that a meeting took place last June to discuss the possibilities of divesting from fossil fuels. The decision was made to maintain current investments but now we known they have been considering it and they can't go back. Now we need to turn up the pressure and show them we mean business! Human health at risk As seen in the QMUL Ethical Investment Policy, Queen Mary is already committed to avoiding direct investment in any company whose business activity is tobacco products, reasoning that the College seeks to promote good health through its School of Medicine and Dentistry. [1] This reasoning can also be applied to fossil fuel divestment because, as the 2015 Lancet Commission reads, climate change is “the greatest threat to human health in the 21st century”. [2] According to the World Health Organisation, from the years 2030 to 2050, climate change is expected to cause approximately 250,000 additional deaths per year by affecting determinants of health such as clean air, safe drinking water, sufficient food and secure shelter. [3] It is entirely conflicting to simultaneously promote good health through the medical school and invest in companies that damage the health of the world. The British Medical Journal has appealed to health institutions to divest and early victories from the British Medical Association, the University of Glasgow and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine show that what we ask is easily achievable and health institutions should stick together and set an example to the world. The guiding principle of ‘do no harm’ should be applied to the full range of activities that Barts and the London and QMUL are involved in. Finances at risk The ethical investment policy also states that “taking ethical and environmental considerations into account in an investment decision will enhance the returns available in the long term”. [1] it is now apparent that investments in fossil fuel companies are not sustainable. The share prices of coal, gas and oil companies depend on the value of known carbon reserves. Considering that countries have agreed to limit global warming to 2°C, 80% of known carbon reserves will have to remain in the ground; [4] “the majority of the world’s reserves are unburnable” says Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England. Fossil fuel assets pose a serious vulnerability to the stability of the financial system in the carbon-constrained world of the future. QMUL is therefore exposing itself to major financial risk by continuing to invest the school’s endowments in fossil fuels. The Environmental Policy of QMUL says “the College is committed to the principles and practices of environmental protection and environmental sustainability across all areas of activity, with College-wide involvement and responsibility”. [5] It is apparent that many official policies of QMUL would converge on a commitment to divest from fossil fuels yet so far no such action has been taken. From Canada’s dirty tar sands to Arctic drilling and hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) for shale gas - the fossil fuel industry is scraping the bottom of the barrel and causing huge environmental and human devastation in the process. Withdrawing our institutions’ financial and moral backing for this climate-wrecking industry is crucial to tackling climate change. References: [1] http://www.arcs.qmul.ac.uk/docs/policyzone/118943.pdf [2] http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60854-6/abstract [3] http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs266/en/ [4] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v517/n7533/abs/517150a.html [5] http://www.qmul.ac.uk/about/sustainability/Documents/80817.pdf
    779 of 800 Signatures
    Created by Dominic Dee
  • Divest Loyola From Fossil Fuels
    Climate change is accelerating, and we here on the Louisiana Gulf Coast are already feeling its impact. Louisiana coastal wetlands are eroding at the rate of one football field per hour as sea levels rise. Oil drilling in the gulf contributes to this land loss. The most recent National Climate Assessment report warns that Louisiana will see billions of dollars in increased disaster costs as early as 2030. This is the effect of a rise in global temperatures attributed to the burning of fossil fuels. According to the United Nations coalition of scientists, in order to prevent a global climatic catastrophe, no more than one-third of the earth’s carbon reserves owned by fossil fuel companies and governments can be extracted from the earth. Although aware of this fact, major fossil fuel companies continue to extract fossil fuels. These fossil fuel emissions disproportionately impact people of color, indigenous communities, and low-income neighborhoods. Through its investments in these companies, Loyola is supporting their efforts and injustice. Loyola students who pay tuition, as well as its donors are unwitting accomplices in perpetuating the social injustices that arise from climate change. Divesting is an ethical obligation for our community, and the future of our planet.
    379 of 400 Signatures
    Created by Pierce Nordone
  • Hertfordshire County Council: Divest your funds invested in fossil fuel industries
    More CO2 in the atmosphere means more extreme weather events that could leave millions of people displaced from their homes. Our government committed to a legally binding climate deal to help prevent this. It's time to break free from fossil fuels and invest in clean energy, for everyone's future. 1. Hertfordshire County Council Pension Fund has around £140,000,000 invested in fossil fuel industries, including BG Group PLC, Royal Dutch Shell PLC and Rio Tinto PLC. 2. The pension fund affects over 180 employers in Hertfordshire including Hertfordshire County Council (including schools), North Herts District Council, Dacorum Borough Council, East Hertfordshire District Council, Hertsmere Borough Council. Broxbourne Borough Council, St Albans District Council, Stevenage Borough Council, Three Rivers District Council, Watford Borough Council and a range of community and voluntary groups. See here for list http://divestherts.org/ 3. 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are the primary cause of recent climate change, largely due to the release of greenhouse gases from the combustion of oil, coal and gas for heat and power. Global warming is happening now - it is not a thing of the future; thanks to our appetite for fossil fuels we’ve already experienced a global temperature rise of about 1°C since the Industrial Revolution.[1] The effects of this rise in temperature are already being felt, causing more frequent and intense extreme weather events, including more tropical storms in some areas, but drought in others. Climatic changes and oceans becoming more acidic due to absorbing excess carbon dioxide present a real threat to whole ecosystems. It’s not just bad for the environment, it’s putting people's lives at risk too due to food and water insecurity and is creating climate change refugees.[2] 4. In order to stop the global climate warming by another 2 °C, 80% of all known fossil fuels must stay in the ground.[3] However, despite all the evidence showing that we need to transition to cleaner forms of energy, fossil fuel companies are continuing to extract dirty fossil fuels, and making huge profits in the process.[4] 5. Investments in fossil fuels are also risky. Recent fluctuations in oil prices means that divesting from fossil fuels would minimise the council's exposure to the financial risk of the 'carbon bubble', whereby companies risk being left with stranded assets (worthless fuel stocks that regulation will prevent from being burned). People and institutions that own shares in the companies will see the value of their investments decrease. (5) 6. By removing investments in these companies Hertfordshire County Council will be showing its commitment to creating a healthy, sustainable future for both the people of Hertfordshire and the planet as a whole. 7. Institutions across the world including churches and universities, as well as local authorities in the UK such as Bristol City Council and Oxford City Council have already committed to divest from fossil fuels. [6] Let's see Hertfordshire join them in making this small but impactful commitment. [1] http://350.org/about/science/ [2] http://climatemigration.org.uk/about-us/ [3] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30709211 [4] http://priceofoil.org/tag/fossil-fuel-industry-profits/ [5] http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/28f00388-0df3-11e5-9a65-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3mHL64WyD [6]http://gofossilfree.org/commitments/
    1,081 of 2,000 Signatures
    Created by Gwen Buck